Explorable Explanations
エクスプローラブル・エクスプラネーション / 2011– / Technique / Reading on the Web
The name Bret Victor gave, in a March 2011 essay of the same title, to writing that embeds a running model inside the prose. Numbers in the body text carry a dotted underline and can be dragged, and pulling one rewrites the rest of the sentence and the figure beside it at the same time. He described the result as a written argument whose assertions are backed by explorable computational models.



At a glance
Visual cues
- Numbers inside the running text sit on a dotted underline and turn blue when touched
- Dragging one of those numbers rewrites the following sentence and the neighboring figure at once
- Figures are not quarantined in a separate sandbox but sit continuous with the paragraphs around them
- Untouched, the piece still reads, because the default values already make the figures meaningful
Best used for
- Publishing an explanation built on a model, where readers should be able to change the assumptions themselves
- Teaching material that has to show not just the conclusion but the conditions under which it flips
Use this style
Take the compact brief into a project or hand the structured version to an AI tool.
Detailed guidance and sourcesProduction rules, reference works, comparisons, research and citation formats
Dictionary entry
- Type
- Set the prose like ordinary reading matter; mark only the live numbers, with an underline and a color, and never with a different typeface.
- Composition
- Hold the text to a single column of roughly 600px and place each figure beside or directly after the paragraph it belongs to, close enough that the handle and its effect share one field of view.
- Material
- Limit the interaction to grabbing and dragging, with no input fields and no submit buttons, and always ship default values that already say something.
- Caution
- If the content only shows up once the reader touches something, everyone who does not touch it gets a blank article.
- Further study
- Bret Victor's 2011 article itself, and the Tangle implementation released with it / the difference between the three types, reactive document, explorable example and contextual information / writing the same argument once with a static figure and once with a variable one, and testing where understanding parts ways
Related entries
- Isotype (アイソタイプ)Shared effects: Trust / Technique.Compare Explorable Explanations and Isotype
- Flowchart (フローチャート)Shared effects: Technique / Trust / Play.Compare Explorable Explanations and Flowchart
Often confused with
More from Reading on the Web
Continue through styles in the same Reading on the Web family, prioritised by shared effects.
- Infinite Canvas (インフィニット・キャンバス)Shared effects: Play.
- Webtoon (Vertical-Scroll Comics) (ウェブトゥーン(縦スクロール漫画))Shared effects: Play.
- Single-Serving Site (シングルサービング・サイト)Shared effects: Play.
Browse all Reading on the Web entries
Cite this entry
The dictionary is meant to be linked to. Take whichever form fits where you are writing.
- Link
- https://indexstyle.org/styles/explorable-explanations
- Markdown
- [Explorable Explanations — IndexStyle](https://indexstyle.org/styles/explorable-explanations)
- HTML
- <a href="https://indexstyle.org/styles/explorable-explanations">Explorable Explanations — IndexStyle</a>