The New Typography vs Typographic Space

ニュー・タイポグラフィ / タイポグラフィック・スペース

Both sit in Experimental Typography, so the question is not what they belong to but how they behave. Both are read here as layout. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.

The New Typography

Turned printed matter into rational information structure through asymmetry, sans-serifs, photography and functional hierarchy.

Typographic Space

Uses the blank of the spread, changes of size, leaps between lines and more than one typeface to lay out reading time and vocal dynamics as space.

The New TypographyTypographic Space
Era1920s–1930s1897– / modernist legacy
FamilyExperimental TypographyExperimental Typography
KindLayoutLayout
CuesAsymmetry / Sans-serif type / Photography / Functional white spaceSentences crossing the spread / Great blanks / Multiple faces / Nonlinear reading order
Best used forRebuilding letterheads and forms so they read in order without ornament · Fixing the hierarchy of headline, text and picture in a single decisionPrint pieces where a poem or a manifesto must carry its own pace and pauses · Using the spread as one field where placement shows vocal dynamics
TypeOne sans in two weights, with hierarchy carried by size aloneAssign faces and sizes as voices and switch them line by line
CompositionDrop centering, set a left axis, divide areas with rules and spaceLet lines leap across the gutter and hold the blank as the largest element
MaterialBlack and red, halftone photography, plain rules, no ornamentWhite paper, one black ink, exact register, stock thick enough to stop show through
CautionWhen asymmetry becomes the aim in itself the reading order is never settled, and the page ends up harder to read than the ornamented one it replaced.Copying only the size of the blanks removes every cue about reading order, so design how blank, size and position govern both the speed and the sequence of reading.

IndexStyle