Concrete Poetry vs Typographic Space

具体詩/コンクリート・ポエトリー / タイポグラフィック・スペース

Both sit in Experimental Typography, so the question is not what they belong to but how they behave. Both are read here as layout. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.

Concrete Poetry

Treats the placement, repetition, blank space and sound of words as the poem itself, not only what they mean.

Typographic Space

Uses the blank of the spread, changes of size, leaps between lines and more than one typeface to lay out reading time and vocal dynamics as space.

Concrete PoetryTypographic Space
Era1950s–1970s1897– / modernist legacy
FamilyExperimental TypographyExperimental Typography
KindLayoutLayout
CuesRepeated words / Shapes made of letters / Large blanks / Dismantled reading orderSentences crossing the spread / Great blanks / Multiple faces / Nonlinear reading order
Best used forPrint pieces where a few words carry the reading speed and the pauses · Exhibitions and wall works that take language itself as the subjectPrint pieces where a poem or a manifesto must carry its own pace and pauses · Using the spread as one field where placement shows vocal dynamics
TypeOne face at one size, emphasis from position and repetition onlyAssign faces and sizes as voices and switch them line by line
CompositionPlace words on a grid so reading can start from any directionLet lines leap across the gutter and hold the blank as the largest element
MaterialWhite paper and one black ink, quality carried by register and marginWhite paper, one black ink, exact register, stock thick enough to stop show through
CautionWhen making a shape comes first, the meaning of the words stops answering their position, and the piece is only letters poured into a picture.Copying only the size of the blanks removes every cue about reading order, so design how blank, size and position govern both the speed and the sequence of reading.

IndexStyle