Bauhaus Stage vs Constructivist Stage

バウハウスの舞台 / 構成主義舞台美術

Both sit in Stage Design, so the question is not what they belong to but how they behave. Both are read here as style. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.

Bauhaus Stage

Schlemmer's stage workshop turned the body into geometry. Spheres and cones in the Triadic Ballet costumes set the human figure dancing as a form in space, and performance art traces its origin to them.

Constructivist Stage

Revolutionary Russia's style that discarded painted backdrops for a bare working machine on stage. The turning structure Popova built for The Magnanimous Cuckold remade stage design as working construction.

Bauhaus StageConstructivist Stage
Era1921–19291922–1930s
FamilyStage DesignStage Design
KindStyleStyle
CuesGeometrized bodies / Costumes of spheres and cones / Three acts by color / Choreography as spatial figureBare structures / Turning wheels and ramps / No backdrop / Biomechanics of the actor's body
Best used forStage costume and dance direction that recasts the body as pure geometry · Exhibition or brand film about the relation between figures and moving bodiesStage sets the actors climb and operate, where the structure itself performs · Trade booths and concert rigs that show their function instead of hiding it
TypeGeometric sans only, sized by the ratio of circle to squareStencil the lettering straight onto the structure, fitted to each panel
CompositionThink in plan and elevation, set positions on a drawn floor gridLeave the back empty and split the height into three working levels
MaterialSpheres, cones and cylinders in primary color and metallic sheenRaw timber and steel with wheels and pulleys left exposed
CautionGluing spheres and cones onto a costume without choreographing the body as a moving form leaves only a geometric fancy dress party.A static decorative tower called constructivist becomes a prop the actors cannot use, and the premise that the structure works disappears.

IndexStyle