Magic Realism vs New Objectivity Photography

マジック・リアリズム / 新即物主義写真

Magic Realism comes from Painting Techniques and New Objectivity Photography from Photography Movements. Both are read here as style. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.

Magic Realism

Painting whose handling is scrupulously realist, yet whose light, placement and silence tip reality one notch out of true. It uses none of Surrealism's distortions; instead it sets ordinary things down with uncanny clarity, summoning unease and stillness at once. The name comes from German art criticism of 1925.

New Objectivity Photography

Steps back from sentiment and records the structure of people and things coolly: sharp focus, frontality, typology.

Magic RealismNew Objectivity Photography
Era1925–1970s1920s–1930s
FamilyPainting TechniquesPhotography Movements
KindStyleStyle
CuesHard, evenly distributed light / Description of uncanny clarity / Figures and objects held motionless / Arrangements that are never explainedSharp focus / Frontality / Repetition and types / Material detail
Best used forBrand photography and film stills that must feel calm and slightly wrong: fragrance, luxury goods, speculative fiction · Editorial illustration for essays whose subject is ordinary life seen from an angle that will not resolvePhotographing trades or buildings under one condition to make them comparable · Showing the detail of a product or a part precisely and without sentiment
TypeA quiet serif set small and clear of the image so it never explains itNo headlines, only the subject name and conditions in one fixed format
CompositionFigures and objects held still and apart, the gap between them left unexplainedFrontal, level, centered, with the same background every time
MaterialHard even shadowless light, edges kept sharp, on a matte stock with no glossDeep depth of field, even overcast light, fine grained printing
CautionReaching for melting clocks and impossible bodies: the moment the description breaks, the work is Surrealist, and the particular chill of the ordinary held too clearly is gone.One frame is no typology, and without matched conditions it ends as a pile of expressionless pictures. Do not trust the pose of objectivity, and read the bias that classification and viewpoint produce.

IndexStyle