Minimalism vs Suprematism
ミニマリズム / シュプレマティスム
Minimalism comes from Functionalism and Suprematism from Geometric Abstraction. Both are read here as style. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.
Minimalism
Removes elements to maximize the meaning and tension of what remains.
Suprematism
Leaves depiction behind, raising felt tension from a few geometric forms and empty space.
| Minimalism | Suprematism | |
|---|---|---|
| Era | 1960s– | 1915–1920s |
| Family | Functionalism | Geometric Abstraction |
| Kind | Style | Style |
| Cues | Vast white space / Few elements / Quiet color / Precise spacing | Floating rectangles / White space / Diagonal gravity / Restricted color |
| Best used for | Focusing attention on a single value · Letting quality speak quietly | Presenting a concept as sensation, not explanation · Unstable motion inside emptiness |
| Type | A light sans-serif or a well-cut serif | Keep type small and neutral, apart from the forms' motion |
| Composition | One message, one focal point, wide margins | Three to seven forms on a diagonal axis, never touching |
| Material | Nearly achromatic; texture in exactly one place | White, black and red at the core; restrict the palette |
| Caution | Missing information is not minimal. Decide priorities before you cut. | Don't stop at scattering shapes. Feel the gravity and spacing continuing beyond the frame. |


%201%E2%80%935%20(1987)%2C%20Tate%20Modern%2C%20London%2C%20UK.jpg?width=320)

