Minimalism vs Sumi-e
ミニマリズム / 水墨画
Minimalism comes from Functionalism and Sumi-e from East Asian Painting. One is style and the other technique. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.
Minimalism
Removes elements to maximize the meaning and tension of what remains.
Sumi-e
With only ink gradations and emptiness, keeps a subject's presence, speed and distance rather than its shape.
| Minimalism | Sumi-e | |
|---|---|---|
| Era | 1960s– | Tang dynasty–present |
| Family | Functionalism | East Asian Painting |
| Kind | Style | Technique |
| Cues | Vast white space / Few elements / Quiet color / Precise spacing | Ink gradation / Dry-brush scratch / Vast emptiness / The speed of one stroke |
| Best used for | Focusing attention on a single value · Letting quality speak quietly | Presence and depth from few elements · Giving quiet brands and cultural projects room to breathe |
| Type | A light sans-serif or a well-cut serif | A light mincho or brush letters, sparingly |
| Composition | One message, one focal point, wide margins | Reserve as much for the unpainted as for the subject |
| Material | Nearly achromatic; texture in exactly one place | Ink, unbleached paper, absorption, bleed |
| Caution | Missing information is not minimal. Decide priorities before you cut. | Not a black brush texture dropped in. Design the stroke order and the meaning of the emptiness. |


%201%E2%80%935%20(1987)%2C%20Tate%20Modern%2C%20London%2C%20UK.jpg?width=320)

