Minimalism vs Steampunk
ミニマリズム / スチームパンク
Minimalism comes from Functionalism and Steampunk from Visions of the Future. Both are read here as style. They are reached for with different intent, which is the fastest way to tell them apart.
Minimalism
Removes elements to maximize the meaning and tension of what remains.
Steampunk
Extends steam-age materials and machinery into a tangible alternate history.
| Minimalism | Steampunk | |
|---|---|---|
| Era | 1960s– | Victorian retrofuture |
| Family | Functionalism | Visions of the Future |
| Kind | Style | Style |
| Cues | Vast white space / Few elements / Quiet color / Precise spacing | Brass / Gears / Leather / Gauges |
| Best used for | Focusing attention on a single value · Letting quality speak quietly | The romance of invention for stories and games · Centering the feel of machinery |
| Type | A light sans-serif or a well-cut serif | Victorian serifs plus technical monospace |
| Composition | One message, one focal point, wide margins | Layer machine drawings, labels, frames |
| Material | Nearly achromatic; texture in exactly one place | Brass, dark brown, soot, old paper |
| Caution | Missing information is not minimal. Decide priorities before you cut. | Don't just paste gears on. Keep the world's technology and society coherent. |


%201%E2%80%935%20(1987)%2C%20Tate%20Modern%2C%20London%2C%20UK.jpg?width=320)
%20vol%202%2C%20plate%20XXI%20-%20Royal%20Coll.jpg?width=320)
%20(24133205098).jpg?width=320)
.jpg?width=320)