Minimalism vs Scandinavian Modern
ミニマリズム / スカンジナビアン・モダン
Minimalism comes from Functionalism and Scandinavian Modern from Scandinavian Design. Both are read here as style. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.
Minimalism
Removes elements to maximize the meaning and tension of what remains.
Scandinavian Modern
Joins function and mass production to the warmth of natural materials, curves that follow the body, and clear usable form.
| Minimalism | Scandinavian Modern | |
|---|---|---|
| Era | 1960s– | late 1940s–1960s |
| Family | Functionalism | Scandinavian Design |
| Kind | Style | Style |
| Cues | Vast white space / Few elements / Quiet color / Precise spacing | Lucid function / Natural materials / Body-following curves / Restrained color |
| Best used for | Focusing attention on a single value · Letting quality speak quietly | Furniture and lighting meant for decades of use, designed for mass production and the body · Interiors where people stay for hours, such as libraries and schools |
| Type | A light sans-serif or a well-cut serif | Quiet sans at modest size that never competes with the object |
| Composition | One message, one focal point, wide margins | Low horizontals, generous windows, and room to walk between the furniture |
| Material | Nearly achromatic; texture in exactly one place | Pale wood, teak, bent plywood, wool, and milky opal glass |
| Caution | Missing information is not minimal. Decide priorities before you cut. | Copying only the warmth of materials leaves a Nordic surface, so resolve comfort and manufacturing, and check the climate, the welfare state, the craft and industry link, and differences between countries. |


%201%E2%80%935%20(1987)%2C%20Tate%20Modern%2C%20London%2C%20UK.jpg?width=320)


