Italian Rationalism vs Novecento Italiano

イタリア合理主義 / ノヴェチェント・イタリアーノ

Italian Rationalism comes from Modern Architecture and Novecento Italiano from Painting Techniques. Both are read here as style. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.

Italian Rationalism

An Italian movement that set out to make the abstraction of modern architecture and the classicism of the Mediterranean hold at the same time. What looks like a white box is in fact carrying ancient proportion in the rhythm of its bays, the depth of its overhangs and the planes of its marble. A textbook for refusing to set the modern against the traditional.

Novecento Italiano

A movement that, after the avant-garde had dismantled form, sought a return to the mass and stillness of Italian classicism. Simplified, solid bodies, subdued earth colour and emphatically frontal composition became the vocabulary of interwar public building and mural painting. A leading case of the return to order, and one that has to be read together with its closeness to the regime.

Italian RationalismNovecento Italiano
Era1926–19431922–1943
FamilyModern ArchitecturePainting Techniques
KindStyleStyle
CuesWhite volumes and a regular rhythm of bays / Deep overhangs and bands of shadow / Marble set against glass / Classical proportion, translatedSimplified, solid bodies / Emphatically frontal composition / Subdued earth colour / Mass recalling classical sculpture
Best used forArchitectural and interior identity that must feel contemporary and rooted at once, for hotels, cultural buildings and heritage brands · Grid design, where the rhythm of bays translates directly into a column structure that stays classical while reading as modernInstitutional identity that wants gravity without ornament, for museums, foundations and civic bodies, provided the political reading is faced rather than ignored · Figurative illustration and sculpture-led art direction in which weight and calm matter more than movement
TypeA geometric sans set to the same module as the bays, with the leading derived from the same proportion.Roman capitals cut to classical proportion and spaced as though incised, aligned to the axis of the figure.
CompositionA strict frontal grid whose bays are equal and whose voids are not, so that the rhythm is regular and the reading is not.Frontal and symmetrical, the figure centred and cut at the knee, the ground a plain plane with no incident.
MaterialWhite render against polished marble and plate glass, with reveals deep enough to cast a real shadow line.Fresco-like matte surfaces in ochre, terracotta and stone grey, lit so that mass is modelled and almost nothing casts a shadow.
CautionKeeping the white box and dropping the proportion: without the underlying ratios it is generic modernism, and the whole argument of these buildings was that the ratios were still present.Taking the monumental frontality as neutral good taste: the same devices were built to speak for a state, and used without that awareness the work carries an argument its author did not intend.

IndexStyle