Graphic Notation vs Staff Notation

図形楽譜 / 五線譜

Both sit in Notation Systems, so the question is not what they belong to but how they behave. Both are read here as style. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.

Graphic Notation

The scores Cage and Cardew drew when they abandoned the staff: shapes, lines, map-like pages. Opening performance to interpretation rather than instruction, the score itself became visual art.

Staff Notation

Notation that fixes pitch to a coordinate, running from Guido's invention of the line to the five-line staff. Time reads left to right and pitch up and down, a flat design still in use after a thousand years and the longest-lived format in information design.

Graphic NotationStaff Notation
Era1950s–11th century–
FamilyNotation SystemsNotation Systems
KindStyleStyle
CuesThe staff abandoned / Instruction by shape and line / Pages open to interpretation / The score as artworkThe five-line coordinate system / Time running left to right / Clefs and key signatures / Bars dividing time
Best used forHanding improvisers a map instead of a list of instructions · Making the page of a piece into a figure worth hanging on a wallEngraving parts a player can follow at sight, spacing designed first · Stacking several voices so an ensemble reads them vertically aligned
TypeFew kinds of sign, with the range where one shape holds one meaningUniform head and stem weight, accidentals given clear space ahead
CompositionShow which direction on the page carries time before anyone playsBar width proportional to duration, page turns placed at rests
MaterialLine weight mapped to loudness, kept dark enough to print cleanThin staff lines, note heads printed darker than the spaces
CautionFreedom claimed without a key or any agreed convention scatters interpretation across players, and the score gets treated as a doodle.Setting every bar to the same width breaks the link between spacing and duration, so fast passages jam and sight readers fall out.

IndexStyle