Glitch vs Minimalism
グリッチ / ミニマリズム
Glitch comes from UI Expression and Minimalism from Functionalism. Both are read here as style. They are reached for with different intent, which is the fastest way to tell them apart.
Glitch
Refuses to hide error and corruption, exposing the fragility of the digital medium itself.
Minimalism
Removes elements to maximize the meaning and tension of what remains.
| Glitch | Minimalism | |
|---|---|---|
| Era | digital | 1960s– |
| Family | UI Expression | Functionalism |
| Kind | Style | Style |
| Cues | Channel shift / Block noise / Scanlines / Dropout | Vast white space / Few elements / Quiet color / Precise spacing |
| Best used for | Expressing uncertainty and system failure · A jolt of tension in music and video | Focusing attention on a single value · Letting quality speak quietly |
| Type | Partially corrupt a monospace or plain sans | A light sans-serif or a well-cut serif |
| Composition | Build the healthy composition first, then break part of it | One message, one focal point, wide margins |
| Material | RGB shift, compression noise, missing pieces | Nearly achromatic; texture in exactly one place |
| Caution | Perpetual glitch loses meaning. Stage the difference between normal and broken. | Missing information is not minimal. Decide priorities before you cut. |


%20sample%20animation.gif?width=320)


%201%E2%80%935%20(1987)%2C%20Tate%20Modern%2C%20London%2C%20UK.jpg?width=320)