Generative Art vs Net.art

ジェネラティブアート / ネット・アート

Both sit in Digital Art, so the question is not what they belong to but how they behave. One is technique and the other style. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.

Generative Art

A way of working in which the maker writes only the rule and the randomness, leaving the drawing to the machine. As in Nees's plotter work, the result is shown as several variants born of one rule.

Net.art

Treats the browser, the link, the transmission error and the network itself as both the material and the site of the work.

Generative ArtNet.art
Era1965-1990s–
FamilyDigital ArtDigital Art
KindTechniqueStyle
CuesOne simple element repeated to fill the field / Variants of a single rule shown side by side / Repetition drifting in angle and position / A density and precision no hand could reachLink structures / Browser UI / Errors / Participation and transmission
Best used forLetting a machine make identifiers or one-off tickets that must all differ · Exhibitions or works where designing the rule is what is on showPublishing work at a URL when it can only exist inside a browser · Making the mechanics of transmission and surveillance the subject itself
TypeLetters handled as coordinates and repetitions with the face itself fixedUse default browser fonts and leave underlined links undecorated
CompositionSeed and random range set, outputs laid side by side to inspect the spreadMake navigation the composition, assuming back buttons and several windows
MaterialLines assumed at a plotter's constant weight, tone made by overlap densityHTML, GIF, error screens and slow loading treated as material
CautionA random range set too wide widens the gap between good and bad results and leaves a pile of output instead of a work.Reproducing the early web look as a flat image leaves nothing that links, transmits or invites participation, and the network that was the site of the work disappears.

IndexStyle