Garden City vs Naturalistic Planting

田園都市 / 自然主義プランティング

Garden City comes from Modern Architecture and Naturalistic Planting from Garden Styles. One is layout and the other style. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.

Garden City

Howard's diagrammed proposal for self-contained towns of planned population joining the advantages of town and country. The concentric diagram materialized at Letchworth and became the template for suburbs and new towns worldwide.

Naturalistic Planting

Planting design modeled on perennial meadow ecologies, led by Piet Oudolf: beauty extended to the dead seed heads of winter, a year-round idea rewriting urban public space from the High Line outward.

Garden CityNaturalistic Planting
Era1898–1990s–
FamilyModern ArchitectureGarden Styles
KindLayoutStyle
CuesConcentric diagrams / Separation by green belt / Planned population / Work near homePerennial and grass communities / The beauty of dieback / Drifts of planting / Ecology as the model
Best used forSetting the frame of a new residential district from green space first · Proposing regional plans built on jobs near homes and a capped populationPlanting public space such as a riverbank or an old viaduct cheaply · Designing a garden open all year that must hold up in winter
TypeDraw the scheme as concentric rings, zone names and populations equal in sizePerennials and grasses, few species repeated in large masses
CompositionPublic buildings at the center, industry outside, housing and farmland betweenDrifts that meander and interlock along blended edges
MaterialTreat the green belt as a building material, fixing width and planting firstA single cut in spring, seed heads and stems left standing
CautionBorrowing only the concentric picture while dropping the green belt and the population ceiling leaves a leafy subdivision with no self-sufficiency left.Copying the look by adding species lets the strongest grasses smother the rest by the second year, and the drift turns into weeds.

IndexStyle