Group f/64 vs Pictorialism

グループf/64 / ピクトリアリズム

Both sit in Photography Movements, so the question is not what they belong to but how they behave. Both are read here as style. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.

Group f/64

A manifesto for straight photography from Weston, Adams and their circle, who took as their banner the edge-to-edge sharpness of an aperture stopped to f/64. Rejecting the haze of Pictorialism, they held that large-format precision and full tonal range were themselves the beauty of a photograph.

Pictorialism

Presented photography as art equal to painting, through soft focus, staged scenes and handworked prints.

Group f/64Pictorialism
Era1932–1935late-1800s–c.1914
FamilyPhotography MovementsPhotography Movements
KindStyleStyle
CuesAll-over deep focus / Large-format precision / A rich grayscale / Directness refusing manipulationSoft focus / Mist and backlight / Painterly composition / Handcrafted prints
Best used forProduct photography of objects whose form is the point, like pottery and tools · Large-format landscape work where tonal range is itself the subjectPortraits meant to be atmospheric pictures rather than records · Landscapes sold as works, with the handmade print part of the value
TypeTitles name the object and the place, nothing poeticTitle and sign by hand in the print margin, never on the image
CompositionFill the frame with the object and drop the ground to plainMove the subject off center, gather the light in one area, sink the rest
MaterialSmallest aperture front to back, both ends of the scale heldSoft focus, backlit mist, hand coated printing that keeps the paper texture
CautionSharpness everywhere becomes the goal in itself, and the picture fills with detail without ever deciding which form the viewer is meant to see.Applying blur uniformly afterwards leaves no trace of anyone following the light, and the result is simply a photograph out of focus.

IndexStyle