Dance Notation vs Graphic Notation

舞踊譜 / 図形楽譜

Both sit in Notation Systems, so the question is not what they belong to but how they behave. Both are read here as style. They are reached for with some of the same intent, which is where they get confused.

Dance Notation

A lineage of attempts to fix bodily movement on paper, from Feuillet's Baroque dance scores to Labanotation. Laban's vertical staff folds weight, direction and time into a single column, an alphabet of movement.

Graphic Notation

The scores Cage and Cardew drew when they abandoned the staff: shapes, lines, map-like pages. Opening performance to interpretation rather than instruction, the score itself became visual art.

Dance NotationGraphic Notation
Era1700– / 1928 Laban1950s–
FamilyNotation SystemsNotation Systems
KindStyleStyle
CuesTime climbing a vertical staff / Columns of direction symbols / Body parts as columns / Trajectory abstractedThe staff abandoned / Instruction by shape and line / Pages open to interpretation / The score as artwork
Best used forRecording choreography so it can be revived without the original cast · Analyzing movement in comparable symbols rather than on videoHanding improvisers a map instead of a list of instructions · Making the page of a piece into a figure worth hanging on a wall
TypeDirection in symbol shape, level in shading, sizes held constantFew kinds of sign, with the range where one shape holds one meaning
CompositionTime climbs from the bottom, one column for each body partShow which direction on the page carries time before anyone plays
MaterialSymbol length equals duration, so run a beat scale down the edgeLine weight mapped to loudness, kept dark enough to print clean
CautionBending symbol length to capture how a move feels makes duration unreadable, and the revival comes out as a different dance.Freedom claimed without a key or any agreed convention scatters interpretation across players, and the score gets treated as a doodle.

IndexStyle